Wpf gridviewcolumn visibility binding

Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. I know that the columns doesn't inherit the datacontext and by reading other posts i thought this would work:.

Binding GridViewRow Visibility to Column IsVisible

However of course it doesn't. The output window does not complain, it seems that the resource i found but the viewmodel property is newer called. DataGridColumn s are not part of visual tree so they are not connected to the data context of the DataGrid.

Use this ProxyElement as StaticResource for data context source in your visibility binding. Sadly setting contents of content controls with any framework elements is not allowed in silverlight. So the workaround would be this is just a guidance code for silverlight Change the framework element resource to something lightweight like a Textblock. Silverlight does not allow specifying static resource of FrameworkElement type.

In the attached dependency property changed event handler, set the bind the data context of the content control to the text block's.

So this way the textblock may not be connected to the visual tree but will probably be aware of the data context changes. Learn more. Asked 9 years, 3 months ago. Active 9 years, 3 months ago. Viewed 33k times.

Net 3. Improve this question. If find your question a little unclear. Are you just trying to make a data column visible or invisible depending on a bound ViewModel property? ChrisBD : Yes that is the idea. The VM prop is set via the datacontext. Felix: What do you mean? Its a contextmenu. Active Oldest Votes. For them to connect together use proxy element approach like this Add a proxy FrameworkElement in your ancestor panel's Resources.

Host it into an invisible ContentControl bound to its Content. Silverlight Users Sadly setting contents of content controls with any framework elements is not allowed in silverlight.

SetBinding TextBlock e. NewValue, TextBlock. Hope this helps. Improve this answer.Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information.

I have a ListView bound to ObservableCollection. Data are loaded from the internet and then added to collection. The download takes few seconds and I want to indicate user that the data is loading.

I would recommend using a IValueConverter to accept your boolean, and return a member of Visibility enumeration. If you want to invert the converter ex: hide the element when your property is truethis answer has a custom implementation of IValueConverter that supports that via XAML.

Simple Converter WPF:Bool To Visibility

Learn more. Asked 8 years, 8 months ago. Active 8 months ago. Viewed 37k times. I created an UserControl that indicates activity. I placed it inside of ControlTemplate. Improve this question. Martin Martin 1, 5 5 gold badges 19 19 silver badges 34 34 bronze badges. Active Oldest Votes.

Extracellular fluid volume deficit

Improve this answer. CodeFuller Thanks, exactly what I was looking for! Would it be possible to create the binding on the UserControl itself? Because of this, you could put the visibility binding on the UserControl with no problem. NET's built in Converter. Walter Stabosz Walter Stabosz 6, 4 4 gold badges 38 38 silver badges 66 66 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name.Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career.

Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. Based on Ben McMillan's answer, but supports dynamic changing of visible property. I've simplified his solution further by removing the IsEnabled property. Your custom GridView class could look like this:. Optionally, you could make the ' CustomGridView. ShowOptionalColumn ' a DependencyProperty to be able to use it as a binding target. Taken from here.

Then create a simple Converter like BooleanToWidthConverter that takes a boolean and returns a double, zero if its false, x width if its true. I'd suggest using a custom property or hijacking an existing one on the parent and then using a custom style on the gridviewcolumnheader to reference that ancestor property. Like this:. There is no Visibility property on the columns, so I decided to set the hidden columns width to zero. Not ideal, as the user can still resize them and make them visible again.

IsThreadIdShown is bound to a check box on the toolbar. And the multi-value converter is:. This works for me Need to bind the Visibility on both the header and the content In this case it is at the end so I don't worry about the Width BUT the user does not get a UI hook to reset the width so if you set the width to zero it is gone. Learn more. Ask Question.

Use .NET's built in Converter

Asked 11 years, 9 months ago. Active 1 year, 10 months ago.Posted 17 May Link to this post. Posted 18 May Link to this post. It is not recommended to define cells of the Grid in that way.

Please, give us more details about your scenario so that we are able to provide you with a possible solution.

What you need to do in order to use them is:. Posted 20 May Link to this post. Posted 26 May Link to this post. The blog post that you are using as a reference is out-of-date and now it is not a recommended approach. However, what you can do in order to bind the visibility of your element you want to hide with the visibility of the column is:.

Posted 30 May Link to this post. Posted 31 May Link to this post. What you can do in this case is to define the property of the column UniqueName.

Unincorporated indian river county map

Thus you can use it instead of the index. For example:.

wpf gridviewcolumn visibility binding

Posted 01 Jun Link to this post. Posted 02 Jun Link to this post. Basically, the first to be executed is the xaml file, but everything depends on what you have written in the code-behind.

Thus there is no straight forward way to say which of the two is the first one. There are a couple of ways of sequences to create your columns and to bind an item to their visibility. In you case you can define all you need in xaml or in the code-behind. Another approach is to define the columns in xaml, give them a specifier by means of UniqueName or x:Name and use it in the code behind. So, please give us more details about the way you want to define your columns and to bind an element to their visibility so that we can be more helpful.

Posted 09 Jun Link to this post. All Products. Feed for this thread. Gili Korman Golander. Member since: Jan In that style I have a control template targeting GridViewRow. In that template I have a couple of GridViewCells definitions.

Quillota que fase esta

Maya Admin. Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans? Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed? Explore the Telerik Public Issue Tracking system and vote to affect the priority of the items.Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career.

Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. What about creating a 0 width column?

wpf gridviewcolumn visibility binding

Here is another solution based on setting the column's width to zero. I have modified it a little. It now works like this:. Make your bindings TwoWay and if the user attempts to drag the column wider OnPropertyChanged will be called and reset the width to 0. You might have to use a binding proxy though for your binding. Now the column looks like its not visible. But i do not know if it will affect anything else. It might be a dummy solution but for now it works.

Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 11 years, 4 months ago. Active 4 months ago. Viewed 32k times. I'm looking for a way to create that. Improve this question. Joseph jun. Melettukunnel Joseph jun. Melettukunnel 5, 18 18 gold badges 58 58 silver badges 87 87 bronze badges. Active Oldest Votes. Edit: Reflecting the modified question.

Improve this answer. Tim Rutter 4, 2 2 gold badges 17 17 silver badges 43 43 bronze badges. Preet Sangha Preet Sangha Thanks for the quick response. Unfortunately, there is no "IsVisible" Property. Melettukunnel Sep 8 '09 at Comment to your edit: That would stil allow the user to resize the column, unfortunately there isn't a Enabled-Property either. See my response for a variant of this using an attached behavior. Setting width to 0 will still make it extendible hence bringing it back on the UI.

It now works like this: Bind the header's visibility to a boolean property of the ViewModel, using a bool-to-visibility converter Use an attached property on the header to set the column's width to zero Here is the code.

Parse value. Visible; else return Visibility. Collapsed header. Helge Klein Helge Klein 8, 8 8 gold badges 44 44 silver badges 68 68 bronze badges. Munawir 3, 8 8 gold badges 29 29 silver badges 45 45 bronze badges.Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career.

Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. I'm fairly new to XAML but enjoying learning it. The thing I'm really struggling with is binding a property to an element in a DataTemplate. I've also added a couple of extra controls below the DataTemplate to prove, to myself, the everything works. I have also implemented Jeff Wilcox's value converter.

Thank you. When I run the app, checking and unchecking the 'Hide Checkbox', controls outside the DataTemplate function as expected but, alas, the Checkbox inside the data template remains unchanged. Another option, if you want something fancier, is to use a proxy object to reference your DataContext.

Police station ka hindi kya hota hai

See this article on DataContextProxy. Learn more. Binding to a viewmodel property in a DataTemplate Ask Question.

Asked 7 years, 10 months ago. Active 10 months ago. Viewed 27k times. I have created a simple WPF example to, hopefully, explain my problem. I have a simple DataModel named Itembut is of little relevance in this example. Controls laid out in MainPage. Improve this question.

StayOnTarget 7, 8 8 gold badges 37 37 silver badges 53 53 bronze badges. Dowse Dowse 93 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 3 3 bronze badges.

Postident filiale near me

Do you get any binding errors in the debug output window in Visual Studio? They are usually a good indication of what's going wrong.

Section 60cc(2a) family law act

Thank for your response. Checked the Output windows and, as you suspected, there were errors. It couldn't 'find' IsCheckBoxVisible.

Applied fix as per Duncan's reply below and all good now.Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. The Columns property is not a dependency property, so you can't bind it.

wpf gridviewcolumn visibility binding

However, it might be possible to create an attached property that you could bind to a collection in your ViewModel. This attached property would then create the columns for you. Note that the ColumnDescriptor class is not actually needed, I only added it for clarity, but any type will do including an anonymous type.

You just need to specify which properties hold the header text and display member name. I took Thomas Levesque's excellent solution and modified it to remove the static collection of GridViews and also add the ability to set a column width and string format, so thought I'd share my code. Behaviour this is stored against each GridView and obviates the need to store the collection-GridView mappings centrally :. Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 10 years, 9 months ago. Active 6 years, 11 months ago.

Viewed 33k times. Improve this question.

Subscribe to RSS

Reza M. Sam Sam Active Oldest Votes. Attached properties using System.

wpf gridviewcolumn visibility binding

Generic; using System. Specialized; using System. ComponentModel; using System. Reflection; using System. Windows; using System.


comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *